6 ms·
It's hard to believe that app that is free for a year and than 99 cents per year could be losing money. /sarc
by mariusz79 12y ago
It's hard to believe that app that is free for a year and than 99 cents per year could be losing money. /sarc
- Pxtl 12y agoIt's not exactly shunting vast amounts of data, I'd think a buck per year per user would be pretty good for text messaging.
- kenrikm 12y agoGiven that it's unlikely users will jump ship if they are happy with it over $1/year and the fact that they have 400 million users I think there's a pretty good chance that revenue number will come up.
- thaumasiotes 12y ago...but there are so many options to send text messages for free. Why pay the $1 / year?
- feld 12y agoPrivacy and no ads. The "free" alternatives are not "free".
- Nursie 12y agoHave you tried textsecure?
- forgotpasswd3x 12y agoTelegram is "free". I'm not sure why "free" needs to be in quotes. I don't know how I feel about Privacy being touted as a benefit of using anything owned by Facebook.