3 ms·
>Haters: "No thanks, way too intrusive. I don't want you tracking me/selling my data/showing me ads." Why is anyone cynical of such an activity deemed a "hater
by ripb 12y ago
>Haters: "No thanks, way too intrusive. I don't want you tracking me/selling my data/showing me ads."
Why is anyone cynical of such an activity deemed a "hater"? Because they don't conform and align with your own views on the subject?
Why not go on step further into common internet vitriol and just label them "trolls" for said disagreement?
I've no issue with Google producing such a product and me buying it, even at a relatively high cost, if the benefits are there. What I don't want is to pay a significant chunk of money for said product AND still have to hand over biochemical data to Google, an advertising firm, to use the thing.