5 ms·
$10 or... $850. One person sued them in small claims court and won. (http://www.mactech.com/2012/02/27/how-fight-att-data-throttling-small-claims-action http:/
by philmcc 12y ago
$10 or... $850.
One person sued them in small claims court and won. (http://www.mactech.com/2012/02/27/how-fight-att-data-throttling-small-claims-action http://www.mactech.com/2012/02/27/how-fight-att-data-throttl...)
He outlines the steps on his website.
(http://www.taporc.com/ http://www.taporc.com/)
- evandena 12y agoI thought you were forced to go to arbitration?
- negativeview 12y agoArbitration clauses may not be legal everywhere. Another shitty() reality is that companies love putting clauses in contracts that won't hold up in court because MANY people just assume that it must be legal and the rest of the contract is still binding, just not the illegal parts. () This is really done to protect mom and pop business. If they accidentally put in a clause that's not legal, it'd really suck if the entire contract were nullified. But big companies with bajillion dollar lawyers use this loophole to essentially intimidate their customers.
- tshaddox 12y agoStill, $850 is only a little over a year of my Internet bill.
- higherpurpose 12y agoOnly because your Internet is so expensive. I pay $13 for 200 Mbps down.
- wavefunction 12y agoThat's a fair amount of money to be giving away for free to lawyers or AT&T.