Aeon is overtly anti-scientific in all the articles from it I've read. The trend tends to be to take something scientific, like cognitive biases or the Milgram

Aeon is overtly anti-scientific in all the articles from it I've read. The trend tends to be to take something scientific, like cognitive biases or the Milgram experiments, use some postmodernist device like Freudian literary criticism or political theory to critique the science, and then conclude that the factual reality is not in favor of the scientific evidence. I think it's just generic post-modernism.