3 ms·
I'm fairly sure that the "accept" does not refer to "absorb without any countermeasures". It's a bit poorly worded. I think it refers to the fact that if your
by nightcracker 12y ago
I'm fairly sure that the "accept" does not refer to "absorb without any countermeasures". It's a bit poorly worded.
I think it refers to the fact that if your device fails due to interference below the legal limit it is your problem to fix, not the device that generated the interference.
- dfox 12y agoI always assumed that it refers to the fact that interference under certain limit should not permanently destroy the device even when such interference may cause the device to behave erratically.