4 ms·
Freeman Dyson, another important physicist, wrote this a few years ago: "I changed my mind about an important historical question: did the nuclear bombings of
by joaorico 12y ago
Freeman Dyson, another important physicist, wrote this a few years ago:
"I changed my mind about an important historical question: did the nuclear bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki bring World War Two to an end? Until this year I used to say, perhaps. Now, because of new facts, I say no. This question is important, because the myth of the nuclear bombs bringing the war to an end is widely believed. To demolish this myth may be a useful first step toward ridding the world of nuclear weapons."
Here's the rest of the text:
http://www.edge.org/response-detail/11732 http://www.edge.org/response-detail/11732
- tzs 12y agoWheeler was worried about the war in Europe, though, and what could have been had the bombs been developed a year earlier. That would have put them early enough to consider delaying D-Day until after the bombs were available. What, I wonder, would have turned out different if D-Day had started with nuking Berchtesgaden?
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]