This is part of a larger attack on anonymity online. That piece from Pacific Standard mentioned in the OP certainly was[1]. Before, it was "think of the childr

This is part of a larger attack on anonymity online. That piece from Pacific Standard mentioned in the OP certainly was[1]. Before, it was "think of the children" used by politicians to justify various censorship measures[2]. Now, it's "think of women" used by the media to undermine anonymous communication. They cannot profit from it therefore anyone who doesn't post banalities under their real name, so they can be safely adorned with ads, is a troll and an abuser. [1] http://thelastpsychiatrist.com/2014/05/cyberbll.html http://thelastpsychiatrist.com/2014/05/cyberbll.html [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Think_of_the_children#As_justification_for_censorship https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Think_of_the_children#As_justi...