3 ms·
If Angular 2.0 is architected the way it says in the docs, then it's really scary. They obsoleted everything - something which many developer put a lot of time
by general_failure 12y ago
If Angular 2.0 is architected the way it says in the docs, then it's really scary. They obsoleted everything - something which many developer put a lot of time and effort into. It doesn't matter if the design is better; what matters is a nice clean migration.
Atleast for me, if this change goes through, I won't return to Angular. Angular 3.0 might rewrite everything again for all I care. I just wouldn't trust the angular devs anymore.
- sfeng 12y agoI see it the exact opposite way. So many projects get encumbered by the decisions made early in their development. I have a current project using Angular 1.3, it works, and I will probably never upgrade it, and that's fine My next project however will be able to use all of the lessons which led to 2.0. Innovation is a part of tech, either the Angular team will do it, or someone else will.