4 ms·
Screw that. If you don't like sites with annoying adds why send them revenue from click throughs? There are also a lot of hard working companies out there that
by chrisBob 12y ago
Screw that.
If you don't like sites with annoying adds why send them revenue from click throughs? There are also a lot of hard working companies out there that would rather not pay $0.25 every time some ass hole with a browser extension visits a page.
edit:toned down.
- easytiger 12y agoNot sure if you've used google to advertise with before but they will work out that this user is clicking maliciously and discard them. The whole point is they won't get revenue from this unless you visit very few sites.
- chrisBob 12y agoSo does that make it better or worse than just blocking adds?
- easytiger 12y agoI think its an attempt at anarchism. This on any scale might render their data useless. Of course they might just ignore all data from this user meaning it changes nothing.
- jackmaney 12y agoWorse, as ad networks can--and do--block publishers for click fraud.
- easytiger 12y agowell they will be able to identify that the user is responsible, not the host. hopefully