3 ms·
I've been using SyncBack Pro in various scenarios for a while: http://www.2brightsparks.com/syncback/sbpro.html http://www.2brightsparks.com/syncback/sbpro.html
by ericcholis 12y ago
I've been using SyncBack Pro in various scenarios for a while: http://www.2brightsparks.com/syncback/sbpro.html http://www.2brightsparks.com/syncback/sbpro.html
It's extremely configurable, supports many source/destination options, and pretty cheap. It's not hosted, SAAS, or cloud-based. But, just point it to an S3 bucket and you've got the same thing.
One scenario I have is a daily snapshot of files, copied locally to a YYYY-MM-DD folder, then zipped, and uploaded to an S3 bucket. Another scenario is twice daily rsync-style backup that copies changes on a large directory to a backup location.
- polskibus 12y ago+1 for SyncBack. With free version you can do NAS backup without problems. Not sure about the Amazon backup. But if you have Synology then you can set it up to do backups to Glacier from NAS instead of from your PC.
- junto 12y agoI had real problems with the Glacier backup on Synology. Always failed.
- svec 12y ago+1 for SyncBack. I use it for in-home backups to a NAS (Synology) as well as another PC on the network. Works perfectly, very configurable, and the Pro version has various cloud options.