3 ms·

What evidence is that?

• SwellJoe 12y ago
  Thousands of years of human consumption without negative effect might be a useful starting point.
  • pyre 12y ago
    Lack of negative effects are not proof of a positive effect.
    • SwellJoe 12y ago
      Survival is a positive effect, I guess.
      • pyre 12y ago
        "It will help you to survive" is a far cry from, "The evidence vastly supports wheat being awesome for your health," though. Based on that logic, all food is "awesome for your health." :P
• cheepin 12y ago
  Besides what other people have said, this link [0] gives a pretty good summary of the arguments for and against. [0] http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/03/30/wheat-much-more-than-you-wanted-to-know/ http://slatestarcodex.com/2014/03/30/wheat-much-more-than-yo...