3 ms·
It sounds like you have only watched the beginning, when they are discussing java vs the jvm. Later we get snippets like these from Gates' own emails: > "Do we
by thomasahle 12y ago
It sounds like you have only watched the beginning, when they are discussing java vs the jvm. Later we get snippets like these from Gates' own emails:
> "Do we have a clear plan on what we want Apple to do to undermine Sun?"
> "I want to get as much mileage as possible out of our browser and Java relationship here. In other words, a real advantage against Sun and Netscape."
And in a conversation Bill participated in:
> "Apple wants to keep both Netscape and Microsoft developing browsers for Mac -- believing if one drops out, the other will lose interest (and also not really wanting to pick up the development burden.) Getting Apple to do anything that significantly/materially disadvantages Netscape will be tough. Do agree that Apple should be meeting - the spirit of our cross license agreement and that Macoffice is the perfect club to use on them."
It's a very different Gates from the philanthrope we see today, but back in the 90ties he was a bit of a dick.
It's a bit slow to watch it all, but the entire thing appears to be transcribed here: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/business/longterm/microsoft/documents/gatespart2.htm http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/business/longterm/micro...
- fnordfnordfnord 12y ago>It's a very different Gates from the philanthrope we see today, but back in the 90ties he was a bit of a dick. IMO Gates the businessman is just a ruthlessly competitive adversary. I don't even see a conflict between him then and his philanthropic activities now. It was also covered pretty well at Groklaw http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=2005010107100653 http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=2005010107...
- thomasahle 12y ago> IMO Gates the businessman is just a ruthlessly competitive adversary. Well, anticompetitive adversary. > I don't even see a conflict between him then and his philanthropic activities now. He certainly seems to be pretty good at both jobs.
- fnordfnordfnord 12y ago>Well, anticompetitive adversary. Touche >He certainly seems to be pretty good at both jobs. I agree, and I am glad he gave us a likeable trait within his lifetime, unlike many of his robber-baron contemporaries and predecessors.