So he goes from: " Thing is, editors hated its bugginess so much that the roll-out was reverted shortly afterwards." to: " Their solution to this was a WYSIW

So he goes from: " Thing is, editors hated its bugginess so much that the roll-out was reverted shortly afterwards." to: " Their solution to this was a WYSIWYG editor, which failed for the basic reason that it denies the fact that Wikipedia is a program. " Something tells me he might be making it up as he goes along! I wonder how successful Microsoft Word would have been with markdown editor.