4 ms·
The net neutrality debate has been oversimplified to the point of being nearly meaningless. Being against internet "slow lanes" is like being against poverty. E
by crazy1van 12y ago
The net neutrality debate has been oversimplified to the point of being nearly meaningless. Being against internet "slow lanes" is like being against poverty. Everyone agrees with the goal, but the devil is in the details. It's completely possible to be for a universally faster internet for all traffic and be against many net neutrality laws just like it is possible to be for getting people out of poverty and being against many welfare policies.
- hackuser 12y ago> Being against internet "slow lanes" is like being against poverty. I'm not sure that's true. While I favor net neutrality I also recognize that there are good arguments for allocating Internet resources to the highest bidder, at least to a significant degree.