5 ms·
Well, LuaJIT had already supported some of 5.2, just not all of it [1]. So I guess the issue is, how long can LuaJIT hold out on being 5.1 compatible while pull
by eslaught 12y ago
Well, LuaJIT had already supported some of 5.2, just not all of it [1]. So I guess the issue is, how long can LuaJIT hold out on being 5.1 compatible while pulling in features from 5.2+ while not fragmenting the language? My (admittedly limited) understanding is that 5.2 was already not fully backwards compatible with 5.1, so if that trend continues, I just have a hard time seeing LuaJIT stay 5.1 compatible without effectively forking the language (even if they don't call it out as such).
[1]: Here is one reference though it's not necessarily the best: http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2012-01/msg00796.html http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2012-01/msg00796.html