3 ms·
> reasonable doubt Even if such existed (it does not), this standard is not applicable to a civil case, only to the criminal trials for destruction of property
by nknighthb 12y ago
> reasonable doubt
Even if such existed (it does not), this standard is not applicable to a civil case, only to the criminal trials for destruction of property/malicious mischief that every single person involved should have to go through.
- Alupis 12y agoFor counterfeit/illegal property? This seems reminiscent of the guy who bought cocaine from his dealer, found out it was cut with flour, then tried to file a police report. I'd think you've had a tough time convincing a judge that you genuinely believed the chip/board you bought from some shady seller on eBay based in China for pennies on the dollar was a legit product. None-the-less, someone will try I'm sure. Then everyone can enjoy the $5 check they get in the mail 1 year later.
- nknighthb 12y agoThis has been thoroughly covered in an earlier thread[0]. The chips do not in themselves violate any law. To whatever extent there may be a trademark violation, that is between FTDI and whoever mislabeled them. None of this entitles FTDI to destroy anyone's property. That's a crime. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8493849 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8493849