4 ms·
I do not want to spend the time to learn new things unless they are directly related to my work. So systemd was a PITA for me, but now I am fine with it (BTW,
by joelberman 12y ago
I do not want to spend the time to learn new things unless they are directly related to my work. So systemd was a PITA for me, but now I am fine with it (BTW, I have used UNIX since the late 60's so have seen a lot). This project looks great, but I do not have the energy to care, I will just deal with whatever comes with my distro. By the way, pick a better name. I suspect many OSS and home grown projects fail for the simple reason that the name, while clever, makes people either think the project is a joke, or some geeky thing, or unprofessional. Either pick an obvious descriptive name, or be prepared to spend a boatload of money building name recognition.
- uselessdguy 12y agoThe name is perfect and I do not see myself changing it. The fact that so many people misunderstand makes it better. The Linux Action Show thought we were calling systemd "useless" and went on a hilarious rant, there's people on LinuxQuestions.org who really insist that it's pronounced "use less dee" (I call it "uselessdee", as in it's of no use, personally).
- brazzy 12y agoSo basically you're doing all this for the lulz of confusing and pissing off people and don't really want anyone to actually use the software?
- uselessdguy 12y agoHumorous names aren't exactly new to free software.
- nknighthb 12y agoAn existing alternative to systemd is called upstart. Three of the most popular VCSs are called git, mercurial, and subversion. A major open-source image manipulation program is known as The GIMP. A popular email client among a certain crowd is mutt. less is more, we snort our networks, and manage our VMs with a vagrant. We compile our mission-critical code with a gnat, use browsers written by organizations named after radioactive lizards and an infant noise, write menu-driven applications with curses, and Uglify our JavaScript. And you're worried about somebody calling their own project "uselessd"?
- rootbear 12y agoWith apologies to uselessdguy, I have to agree that the name is not an asset. I have NO problem with clever names, but sometimes they are a bit too much. For example, I always though that Lesstif (a clone of Motif) was a silly, off-putting, name. As to the substance of it, I'm not thrilled with systemd and generally agree with the argument that it's taking on too much. So I wish the uselessd project well, if for no other reason than it may encourage systemd to address some of it's shortcomings.