> Their forces didn't invade they had no new troops, the troops where there as part of a rented military base to practise water maneuvers on the black sea, and

> Their forces didn't invade they had no new troops, the troops where there as part of a rented military base to practise water maneuvers on the black sea, and I dread to think what would have happened if they hadn't been. You have no idea what are you talking about. They brought much more troops there than were on rented military base. But even without that, it's still a breach of international borders and an invasion. It's not an uprising. And obviously Russia had no bases in other parts of Ukraine! > the referendum was legitimate and acknowledged by the EU. It wasn't. > and yes, Russian language was not allowed anymore. How so? > officially it's supported by their constitution, but that was rectified when the new government got to power. Stop spreading bullshit. I live in Ukraine. The law which they tried to remove was just not working. Nobody stops you from speaking Russian (in fact, I mostly speak Russian - at home, at work, and at government organizations), it was never oppressed. > also, lets not talk about her phone call with the Estonian prime minister urging them to "nuke all the fuckers". "her"? Who is "her"? What are you even talking about? > doesn't reek of stability to me. Stability? Of course not, our shitty president was just overthrown, Ukraine was in crisis, and Russia's attack was surely just in time.