4 ms·
This is crazy. Were I hiring, I'd kill to have someone that experienced and with likely far fewer "life liabilities" (I'm doubting he's going to start having b
by MicroBerto 12y ago
This is crazy. Were I hiring, I'd kill to have someone that experienced and with likely far fewer "life liabilities" (I'm doubting he's going to start having babies or go absolutely insane over some girl he can't get out of his mind... or disappear playing video games for two weeks straight)
Have him keep at it. Someone will appreciate what he's got.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- 2muchcoffeeman 12y agoYeah, but most companies don't want to pay for someone with that sort of experience. I think most people think of developers/IT staff largely as 'resources'. There's generally no career path for a developer that involves still doing a lot of development.
- bby 12y agoHow much does your dad want?
- humanrebar 12y agoYour intention is probably admirable (reassuring someone about a rough situation), but your list of life liabilities basically appeal to other prejudices based on age, gender, and possibly relationship status. I'm not particularly impressed by this logic.
- collyw 12y agoIts reality though. The age group of my current workplace probably averages early 30's, and we have a lot of people taking time off to have babies. I seem to be the only person that does any work a lot of the time.
- MicroBerto 12y agoThe logic is actually the best part of my post. The worst part is the fact that if I were to actually hire like that, it'd be illegal. That's what sucks. Land of the free though, right?