2 ms·
he did mention they had disgruntled shareholders. e.g. complaining about paying $300k for a $100 item. couldn't they have used that to halt the payment to the s
by gcb0 12y ago
he did mention they had disgruntled shareholders. e.g. complaining about paying $300k for a $100 item. couldn't they have used that to halt the payment to the small (and illegal) shareholders of the past?
- tptacek 12y agoI don't know, but the sense I got is that those stakeholders were larger, more formal investors, in which case RegD doesn't help them --- they're assumed to be sophisticated.