3 ms·
Well, this post and http://lwn.net/Articles/616571/ http://lwn.net/Articles/616571/ does seem to indicate they're planning to keep some level of compatibility w
by ultramancool 12y ago
Well, this post and http://lwn.net/Articles/616571/ http://lwn.net/Articles/616571/ does seem to indicate they're planning to keep some level of compatibility with other init systems at least.
I'm not in love with sysvinit, I just don't think systemd is the best option. It clashes, at least with my views on simplistic system design philosophy. OpenRC and FreeBSD's rc seem notably better than both systemd and sysvinit to me.
- e7620 12y agoI agree with everything you said, my point was that it's necessary to be prepared, in case systemd becomes a hard dependency for Debian, which is likely given that more software is depending on systemd, and the lead developer is trying to "merge" linux with systemd. And in that case, I think only Gento is willing to fork.