3 ms·
I can't find a license?
by spdegabrielle 12y ago
I can't find a license?
- rtorr 12y agoNothing here either https://source.ind.ie/project/phoenix/tree/master https://source.ind.ie/project/phoenix/tree/master.
- misnome 12y agoThis. Pretty Ironic (And I opened the source tree, which doesn't have the licence either). Besides, wouldn't the best way to start this sort of thing be to write an LLVM frontend, rather than a new main.c? I get the impression more time has been spent on the "Launch Site" than the actual "Product".
- chc 12y agoI think the primary purpose at this point is to try and get Apple to not force the community to divide the development effort like this. They would rather not move forward with this codebase.
- akbar501 12y agohttps://source.ind.ie/project/phoenix/blob/master/LICENSE https://source.ind.ie/project/phoenix/blob/master/LICENSE
- misnome 12y agoRight, added likely in response to this post. https://source.ind.ie/project/phoenix/commit/4fc86be27e056620605f989665d502a2eac36df3 https://source.ind.ie/project/phoenix/commit/4fc86be27e05662... Thrown GPL on it, which doesn't exactly come across as considered - aren't a lot of Apples contributions to and development of Clang - including of course the objective c frontent, under the BSD-alike licence that it shares with LLVM?
- 0x09 12y agoBeing that this is essentially part of the GNUstep project (of which Greg Casamento is the maintainer), which uses the GPL for all its application-level code, it's not surprising.