> That would be awful it it were true. I totally agree with you. My intent to know the context of discussions, people and debate that went on for three days w

> That would be awful it it were true. I totally agree with you. My intent to know the context of discussions, people and debate that went on for three days while Dr. Khan's health degraded was simply this: Could groupthink have been responsible for the outcome and been avoided? If so, can it be done in the future? If you look at my original comments closely, I only complained about racially driven down-votes from some users on HN and shared my fears about a similarly driven group-think that might / might not have happened in Africa. Since there is no data on that, it should be outed. I will not myself be excusable if I were to really accuse someone (or a group) simply by their color, especially after reading some article on HN. All I seek is the details or think that led to the unfortunate decision. I can form my opinion off it.