3 ms·

Building on OSX Mavericks (assuming XCode and XQuartz already around) 1) Download from http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/ http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

by jmount 12y ago

Building on OSX Mavericks (assuming XCode and XQuartz already around) 1) Download from http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/ http://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/ emacs-24.4.tar.gz emacs-24.4.tar.gz.sig 2) Confirm: gpg --keyserver pgp.mit.edu --recv-keys A0B0F199 gpg --verify emacs-24.4.tar.gz.sig 3) Build (from INSTALL): cd emacs-24.4 ./configure --with-jpeg=no --with-gif=no --with-tiff=no make src/emacs -Q make install 4) run: /usr/local/bin/emacs

sjm 12y ago
Alternatively, until homebrew is updated you can run brew edit emacs and change the url and sha256 to match 24.4, then run brew install emacs with whatever options you would like (brew options emacs for a list). I haven't tested this yet, but it should work, and I will report back after I've tried. edit: So this did work, I used the .tar.xz with sha256 47e391170db4ca0a3c724530c7050655f6d573a711956b4cd84693c194a9d4fd. One thing to note is that the old 24.3 stable formula has a bunch of patches applied that are no longer required, so you need to edit those out as well (this area: https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/blob/master/Library/Formula/emacs.rb#L38-L66 https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/blob/master/Library/For...).
- dgempesaw 12y ago
  Update a few hours later: without having tried it myself, it looks like the formula for emacs has been updated to 24.4: https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/commits/a0b095b/Library/Formula/emacs.rb https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/commits/a0b095b/Library...
  - sigzero 12y ago
    Sweet. Installing it when I get home.
  - hollerith 12y ago
    The Homebrew package for Emacs with Mac-specific changes by a professor named YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu has also been updated: https://github.com/railwaycat/homebrew-emacsmacport/commits/master https://github.com/railwaycat/homebrew-emacsmacport/commits/... For 2 or 3 years now, whenever I have compared the two, the current version of "Mitsuharu" Emacs has always had fewer Cocoa-related bugs than the current (release) version of "FSF Emacs" (i.e., Emacs without the professor's patches applied). I am writing this comment because this Mitsuharu fellow seems very reticent about promoting his own (excellent) work.
shiven 12y ago
Alternatively: http://emacsformacosx.com/ http://emacsformacosx.com/ Easy-peasy!!! (But, clearly, not as secure as verifying the sources and compiling yourself.)
tedunangst 12y ago
Your key fetching command is vulnerable to the deadbeef attack. That could be anybody's key.
- jmount 12y ago
  True, I didn't find any notes on what key to use and the key I typed in is the one the signature itself said was missing (so it is in fact a bad choice). Your criticism is valid. Sorry if I misled anyone, I meant to fix that but I didn't find much guidance on the gnu site as to what signatures to load to bootstrap trust.
  - tedunangst 12y ago
    No worries, end to end PGP leaves a lot to be desired, but I feel it's important to point out when the common recipe steps fail to protect against exactly the adversary one would think they do.
  - jmount 12y ago
    Just a note: I think I was hoping (but didn't confirm) that I was downloading the key from GNU and the file from a mirror. So I thought I had the minor protection that I was at least safe from somebody who could only alter the mirror. But I agree with the criticism: not being clear what you are claiming to actually check in a crypto-situation can confuse others and cause harm. Sorry about that.

by jmount 12y ago

sjm 12y ago

Alternatively, until homebrew is updated you can run brew edit emacs and change the url and sha256 to match 24.4, then run brew install emacs with whatever options you would like (brew options emacs for a list). I haven't tested this yet, but it should work, and I will report back after I've tried. edit: So this did work, I used the .tar.xz with sha256 47e391170db4ca0a3c724530c7050655f6d573a711956b4cd84693c194a9d4fd. One thing to note is that the old 24.3 stable formula has a bunch of patches applied that are no longer required, so you need to edit those out as well (this area: https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/blob/master/Library/Formula/emacs.rb#L38-L66 https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/blob/master/Library/For...).

dgempesaw 12y ago
Update a few hours later: without having tried it myself, it looks like the formula for emacs has been updated to 24.4: https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/commits/a0b095b/Library/Formula/emacs.rb https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew/commits/a0b095b/Library...
- sigzero 12y ago
  Sweet. Installing it when I get home.
- hollerith 12y ago
  The Homebrew package for Emacs with Mac-specific changes by a professor named YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu has also been updated: https://github.com/railwaycat/homebrew-emacsmacport/commits/master https://github.com/railwaycat/homebrew-emacsmacport/commits/... For 2 or 3 years now, whenever I have compared the two, the current version of "Mitsuharu" Emacs has always had fewer Cocoa-related bugs than the current (release) version of "FSF Emacs" (i.e., Emacs without the professor's patches applied). I am writing this comment because this Mitsuharu fellow seems very reticent about promoting his own (excellent) work.

shiven 12y ago

Alternatively: http://emacsformacosx.com/ http://emacsformacosx.com/ Easy-peasy!!! (But, clearly, not as secure as verifying the sources and compiling yourself.)

tedunangst 12y ago

Your key fetching command is vulnerable to the deadbeef attack. That could be anybody's key.

jmount 12y ago
True, I didn't find any notes on what key to use and the key I typed in is the one the signature itself said was missing (so it is in fact a bad choice). Your criticism is valid. Sorry if I misled anyone, I meant to fix that but I didn't find much guidance on the gnu site as to what signatures to load to bootstrap trust.
- tedunangst 12y ago
  No worries, end to end PGP leaves a lot to be desired, but I feel it's important to point out when the common recipe steps fail to protect against exactly the adversary one would think they do.
- jmount 12y ago
  Just a note: I think I was hoping (but didn't confirm) that I was downloading the key from GNU and the file from a mirror. So I thought I had the minor protection that I was at least safe from somebody who could only alter the mirror. But I agree with the criticism: not being clear what you are claiming to actually check in a crypto-situation can confuse others and cause harm. Sorry about that.