4 ms·
Well it is limited by Emacs' display engine. It is obviously not supposed to replace your default browser. But it is usually good enough to view html documenta
by fafner 12y ago
Well it is limited by Emacs' display engine. It is obviously not supposed to replace your default browser. But it is usually good enough to view html documentation. Which is really something you want inside your editor.
- robertfw 12y agoI don't really see this, but perhaps it's because I've been spoiled by the light of tiling windows managers
- simias 12y agoI haven't used eww but I use emacs-w3m from time to time and even though I use a tiling WM as well it's convenient to have regular editor commands work in the html buffer to copy/paste code snippets. Also stuff like hippie-expand will be able to complete symbols present in the html buffer which is pretty nice.
- viksit 12y agoActually - it would be cool if there was something that allowed you to render markdown atleast. Also, is this display limitation a function of the OS? In which case, shouldn't Cocoa/GTK or other versions not have this issue and be able to actually embed nicer rendering in there with nice fonts?
- mej10 12y agoIt isn't a limitation of the OS, or of Emacs really. There is a build where you can embed GTK widgets inside of Emacs. It just isn't at all standard or, last I checked, well supported (on the level that the usual Emacs distribution is).
- tuhdo 12y agoThis web browser in Emacs is usable inside a terminal, and it displays HTML really nice. Much better than something like elink. Other GUI web browser is not.
- jonknee 12y ago> But it is usually good enough to view html documentation. Which is really something you want inside your editor. Is it? I'd much rather have proper HTML rendering in another window than a kludge "in my editor".