4 ms·
That's not really accurate. They're banned because there is no net benefit if both sides have them, and they only serve to make wars more destructive. The exa
by fiatmoney 12y ago
That's not really accurate. They're banned because there is no net benefit if both sides have them, and they only serve to make wars more destructive. The exact same logic lead to parallel bans on exploding / poisoned / expanding / fragmenting ammunition and later land mines.