3 ms·
This is consistent with enterprise software as an industry in general, particularly ones under companies that have lost enough engineers and "product people" th
by devonkim 12y ago
This is consistent with enterprise software as an industry in general, particularly ones under companies that have lost enough engineers and "product people" that causes a bit of a downward spiral as more and more salespersons are leveraged to make up for diminishing momentum of a once-high traction product / service.
Sure, Google sells stuff to governments and same with Amazon, but these teams are usually isolated or farmed off to third parties that serve as bullshit shields for the primary engineering-oriented company. In the inverse, a sales-oriented culture will shed engineering and hold them at arms length in precisely the same way. Neither are "better" exactly, but I like to point out the stock performance of these companies as evidence of the reality that you can't rely upon salespeople and M&A to produce results that pleases anyone.
- yuhong 12y agoIn the case of IBM, I think Sam was promoted from sales. I wonder what happened that led to that.