2 ms·
I personally prefer the workflow of writing all the necessary code (not an arbitrary number) and then patch committing. You get the best of two worlds, atomic
by Trufa 12y ago
I personally prefer the workflow of writing all the necessary code (not an arbitrary number) and then patch committing.
You get the best of two worlds, atomic commits and enough code for your commits to make sense in context.
- Anderkent 12y agoThis is the same as doing WIP commits then re-building the history when done, except you can't move your WIP between machines easily, can't leave yourself notes when wrapping up for the day, etc etc