Official release: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/media/library/notaware http://www.ucl.ac.uk/media/library/notaware Some interesting points: 1. "They were able to accur

Official release: http://www.ucl.ac.uk/media/library/notaware http://www.ucl.ac.uk/media/library/notaware Some interesting points: 1. "They were able to accurately categorise 66% of the negative words compared to 50% of the positive ones." I'd have to see the accuracy on "neutral" images, but assuming equal distribution of positive/negative/neutral categorisation, you would expect a 33% response normally. However, if people tend not to categorise the words as neutral this would be closer to 50% on positive/negative. 2. In 1974 despite no evidence that it worked the UN said it was a major threat to human rights