3 ms·
In my perspective it is often expediency; it takes a large and sustained effort to redirect a civil service as large as the US, kind of like trying to steer a 4
by tankenmate 12y ago
In my perspective it is often expediency; it takes a large and sustained effort to redirect a civil service as large as the US, kind of like trying to steer a 400m long container vessel.
Here's a look at one of the most extreme bureaucracies the world ever produced, it is the result of expediency and unchecked power combined with ideology over evidence;
http://www.galorebot.com/bureaucracy/essay.htm http://www.galorebot.com/bureaucracy/essay.htm
Keeping such large organisations in check requires the fortitude to keep hitting your head against a brick wall while also remaining sharp minded and sane; all the while making progress.
- innguest 12y ago> it takes a large and sustained effort to redirect a civil service as large as the US, kind of like trying to steer a 400m long container vessel. That's why Thomas Jefferson and others straight out of Enlightenment wanted for the Federal government top be very limited and for the law-making power to be left to the states. Each US state is much smaller than the US.