3 ms·
It's not at all inaccurate. Might be alarmism, I don't know. But I think it just demonstrates the ways in which users' expectations about privacy are mismatche
by bo1024 12y ago
It's not at all inaccurate.
Might be alarmism, I don't know. But I think it just demonstrates the ways in which users' expectations about privacy are mismatched with the products they use. For example, your average non-tech-savvy user would never realize that an important privacy setting is in a search setting marked "suggestions".
It's hard to say more without seeing the text of Apple's Privacy Documentation that is referred to at the top of the article.
- jsmthrowaway 12y ago> For example, your average non-tech-savvy user would never realize that an important privacy setting is in a search setting marked "suggestions". Is this not clear enough? http://i.imgur.com/i1Zq3E4.png http://i.imgur.com/i1Zq3E4.png
- dvhh 12y agoLet's imagine that the name would be replaced by a slightly let popular company, say one which name begin by an F or a G even one with an M, pichfork would have been already out.