3 ms·
KDE doesn't require systemd. The KDE folks are still concerned about operating on the BSDs. Some of them are still concerned about running on Windows [0] and OS
by simoncion 12y ago
KDE doesn't require systemd. The KDE folks are still concerned about operating on the BSDs. Some of them are still concerned about running on Windows [0] and OS X [1].
Elias Probst:
"Reading the comments shows a lot of misconceptions about +Martin Gräßlin's proposal [to use systemd features to make Plasma startup under Wayland a little bit simpler]:
* KDE SC will still allow to use the old-way to startup a KDE session, as it will still ship the X11-way of doing it for [BSDs]. If you want to use a modern Wayland/systemd stack you're fine by using the defaults. If you don't want to: use the old X11/script startup stack.
* KDE SC won't enforce using systemd as init-system by this change. Instead, it will use parts of systemd which are completely independent from the init-system being used to handle the startup of the KDE session. If systemd is being used as an init-system, that's a plus because of some systemd integration effects, but that's all about it."
via: https://plus.google.com/+MartinGr%C3%A4%C3%9Flin/posts/GMtZrNCeaLD https://plus.google.com/+MartinGr%C3%A4%C3%9Flin/posts/GMtZr...
[0] http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-windows/2014-October/thread.html http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-windows/2014-October/threa...
[1] http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-mac/2014-October/thread.html http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-mac/2014-October/thread.ht...