I know this is just a nitpick, but calling it "SystemD" everywhere on this page when everything written about systemd asks you very nicely to call it "systemd"

I know this is just a nitpick, but calling it "SystemD" everywhere on this page when everything written about systemd asks you very nicely to call it "systemd" shows these guys are either not as familiar with systemd as you should probably be if it's that much of an issue for you, or they're deliberately trying to be edgy. Neither of which inspires confidence in their ability to maintain a potential fork.