3 ms·
One might suggest that a movement that refuses to police itself is deliberately courting such plausible deniability. [1] Or one might mention all of the people
by ijk 12y ago
One might suggest that a movement that refuses to police itself is deliberately courting such plausible deniability. [1] Or one might mention all of the people with documented links to both harassment and the hashtag.[2]
> They're not actual people concerned about video game journalism.
I agree with you! Pity that so many of them seem to keep saying that they are concerned with journalism, instead of just admitting what they are doing.
[1] https://storify.com/a_man_in_black/gamergate-and-harassment https://storify.com/a_man_in_black/gamergate-and-harassment
[2] https://storify.com/a_man_in_black/gamergate-is-a-misogy https://storify.com/a_man_in_black/gamergate-is-a-misogy
- Goladus 12y ago> One might suggest that a movement that refuses to police itself is deliberately courting such plausible deniability. Perhaps you didn't hear about the time when someone created a new board on 8chan specifically to harass Brianna Wu, and the Leaders of Gamergate from the /gg/ board went and flooded the new board with nonsense until mods woke up and took care of the problem. Or when they tracked twitter attacks on Anita Sarkeesian to a journalist in Brazil... Seriously, the standards you are trying to hold GamerGate to are completely and utterly ridiculous.