5 ms·
I've always wondered what the actual best practice is with rejection rules. I tend to prefer issuing reset/unreachable since as the article points out it does m
by gnoway 12y ago
I've always wondered what the actual best practice is with rejection rules. I tend to prefer issuing reset/unreachable since as the article points out it does make the port look like it's truly unused. On the other hand, eliminating the response packets has benefits of its own: the scan takes longer, the system doesn't incur the response overhead and it won't participate in any attack scenario depending on sending responses to a spoofed address.
- UnoriginalGuy 12y agoGiven the options couldn't you effectively stealth services by having the firewall drop everything unused from 1-5000 (instead of letting the OS send a reset packet).
- zokier 12y agoWhy stop at 5000? Why not default drop for all ports (except whitelisted ones)?