Imagine a slightly different version of this story, told from the other viewpoint: A woman writes a negative review of a book that she feel trivializes underag

Imagine a slightly different version of this story, told from the other viewpoint: A woman writes a negative review of a book that she feel trivializes underage rape and PTSD. She encourages others to see the book in that same light. She hasn't used her real identity online, and she's sensitive about rape and trauma. Is she hiding her ID for reasons of safety? The author then net stalks her, finding out her where she lives and where she works. The author calls her (more than once!) at work, saying she knows who she really is. The author also drives to her home, but doesn't knock and leaves a book with the creepy title A Short Guide To A Happy Life (is it a hidden message? SHORT LIFE?) on the doorstep. Then the author publishes her real name in a major newspaper, resulting in views all over the planet. Whatever reason she had for keeping a low profile, even if it was for her own safety from a past abuser, it's blown now. The story sure looks different from that angle. Not saying it's all the way things are, but it's certainly a valid alternate view.