3 ms·
> because we would definitely not want to employ someone who is uncomfortable with transparency And, likewise, I imagine quite a number of people here would de
by Osmium 12y ago
> because we would definitely not want to employ someone who is uncomfortable with transparency
And, likewise, I imagine quite a number of people here would definitely not want to be employed by someone who takes that sort of attitude.
There are some things that it's just not possible to ethically consent to within the context of an employer-employee relationship. It might seem like everyone is onboard with this transparency, but it might equally make someone deeply uncomfortable but also feel like they're unable to question it without putting their job in jeopardy–as your comment just here has hinted that it might.
- swombat 12y agoI really don't understand the downvoting here. Seems evidence of very reactionary groupthink going on there. If you disagree, fine. GrantTree only employs 20 people at the moment. You don't have to work with us. There are literally millions of other places you can work who do not have transparency as a core value. I'll add that transparency is not something that's sprung on people at the last minute. It is explained abundantly upfront to people before they start. We're in central London, where there are a bajillion other startups and companies. It's not like they have to take a job with us. Surely you can accept that some people out there are interested in working in a transparent company, even if you personally aren't.