3 ms·
1. ITER (and NIF) may turn out to be irrelevant: http://www.technologyreview.com/business/23102/ http://www.technologyreview.com/business/23102/ 2. It's been
by mnemonicsloth 17y ago
1. ITER (and NIF) may turn out to be irrelevant: http://www.technologyreview.com/business/23102/ http://www.technologyreview.com/business/23102/
2. It's been a while, but IIRC we're looking at at least 50 more years of U-235 and maybe two centuries of plutonium and thorium (lowballing). I have a hard time believing that there won't be even one revolutionary breakthrough in how we use or generate energy in the next 150-250 years.