7 ms·

Review of a Linux laptop: Thinkpad T400. Do not buy it.

46 points by old-gregg 17y ago

scythe 17y ago
Google found this video of the t400 for those interested: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evk-Ln_TFLA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evk-Ln_TFLA Apparently some people like the screen; some absolutely despise it. Here's a complete review - warning, bad music incoming: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKNxecHXUAU&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKNxecHXUAU&feature=relat...
dryicerx 17y ago
This is rather depressing. I've been a huge ThinkPad fan, on my 3rd T-series at the moment... a T61p that still wore a IBM sticker and can't praise more for the wonderful WUXGA screen... but guess Lenovo's corner cutting is finally catching up, hopefully this is just a isolated case. I'll always love and remember the thinkpads (at least IBM era) for their tank like qualities; being able to use the laptop as a blunt weapon in a fight and later using the same laptop to code and blog is a good feeling.
- jonny_noog 17y ago
  Agreed. I have an IBM/Lenovo T60 which I run Debian on and it has served me well, had it now for must be going on three years, never had an issue with it, the build quality is rock solid. But even when these ThinkPads were released, around about the time that they were making the brand transition from IBM to Lenovo, I had doubts about what this meant for the future of the ThinkPad. I have heard numerous horror stories about the quality of Lenovo gear since then. I am saddened to think that my T60 may be the last ThinkPad I will ever have considered buying. But then I am somewhat consoled when I remember that my next laptop will probably be a Mac to go with my recently acquired Mac desktop. Aside from not being able to so readily beat someone to death with a MacBook Pro, for me, Mac laptops are the new ThinkPads, mainly because I bought my ThinkPad primarily to run a Unix-like OS (Debian), and OS X fits that desire too. You also get to pay a premium for a Mac, just like a ThinkPad. :P
  - mst 17y ago
    I keep vaguely hearing horror stories but all the people I can actually pin down as owning lenovo thinkpads are having a great time with them - me included. I suspect what we actually have here is a case of the usual random set of poor experiences with any given product being much more conversationally trafficked because people assume that "this is my first troublesome thinkpad" must be because of the Lenovo switch rather than just being an unfortunate coincidence.
    - jonny_noog 17y ago
      Yeah, just to be clear, when I said "I have heard numerous horror stories about the quality of Lenovo gear since then." I was actually referring mainly to anecdotes I had heard from people relating to non-ThinkPad Lenovo laptops. As I said, I've had no problem with my T60, it's a great laptop for my purposes and I have not purchased a ThinkPad newer than my T60. My only concern about the newer ThinkPads - based off these anecdotes - is that the quality of ThinkPads may be adversely affected as they ostensibly become more Lenovo and less IBM.
- tomjen2 17y ago
  Not just that, but they also had a decent keyboard. I took out my old one (pre Lenovo) and was just amazed by how good the keyboard was.
- ErrantX 17y ago
  Agreed. We have 5 old thinkpads from the IBM era (they are "R5" series I think off the top of my head) which run Backtrack or other flavours of Linux and work without fault even today. We bought some Lenovo Thinkpads the other week for new employee's to use remotely - what a load of awfulness they were! Already trying to find a decent replacement.
al3x 17y ago
I was researching various Thinkpad models for a friend (and out of idle curiosity at the non-Mac laptop market) the other week, and found that complaints about the display quality are true across the Thinkpad line, even including their pricey MacBook Air competitor, the X300. Pretty surprising, given the Thinkpad reputation for quality.
- pyre 17y ago
  > Pretty surprising, given the Thinkpad reputation for quality. Why is that? The reputation of ThinkPads was created while they were owned by IBM. It's just taken a while for Lenovo to start screwing with the brand that it bought.
earl 17y ago
I swore off Thinkpads when my $2K (at the time) T60 couldn't drive an external 24 inch monitor without horrid text flickering. Thinkpad's "solution" was to buy a $350 dock that had better external monitor electronics. Um, thanks, but no thanks.
tdavis 17y ago
I was wondering when somebody was going to put out a consumer-grade LCD so terrible that a consumer actually noticed. Even Macs use sub-par panels and nobody seems to notice. I await the day when I am not considered a "Professional" for requiring S-IPS or better panels -- I'm tired of paying a near-50% markup on my LCDs.
- cubicle67 17y ago
  I have an early 2006 20" iMac (one of the first Intel ones) and it has one of the best displays I've ever seen. I also have a 1st gen unibody Macbook, and the display on that is pretty crappy.
  - chrisbolt 17y ago
    The 20" iMacs have far worse LCDs than the 24" ones though.
    - pmjordan 17y ago
      The 2006 (Core Duo as opposed to Core 2 Duo; white plastic case) iMacs still had Matte displays if I remember correctly, I don't think there were 24" versions of those. Today's 20" aluminium iMacs have awful displays.
      - cubicle67 17y ago
        yes, it was a matt display Core Duo, and also sure 20" was the largest (sizes were 17" and 20")
    - yardie 17y ago
      The first gen 20" iMacs were the midgrade model at the time. The 17" iMacs came with the crappy displays because they were the baseline. Not all 20" iMacs had worse LCDs than the 24" but all 24" iMacs have the best LCDs available. Within reason of course. Most people won't buy a $1200 calibrated NEC or Lacie. 2006 - 20" iMac IPS 24" iMac IPS 2009 - 20" iMac TN 24" iMac H-IPS
moe 17y ago
Did I miss the sarcasm or does he really suggest to buy apple instead? Last time I checked the Apple panels were horrible. Perhaps not as bad as this foul egg, but still with comparable viewing angle problems; the slightest head-movement would wash out the top or bottom part of the display. I also recall horrible contrast (white bloom)...
- old-gregg 17y ago
  Regular white Macbooks are pretty bad, sure but matte MBPs are OK: the color gamut is still limited by 6 bits but viewing angles aren't bad IMO. According to my extensive googling only HP's "DreamColor" line of laptops gives you a true 8-bit non-TN panel. http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-10041-10146 http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-10041-...
- ubernostrum 17y ago
  I can't say I've ever had quality problems with the screens on any of the Mac laptops I've used. Admittedly I'm not a graphic designer (and I'm mildly colorblind) so I may not be able to recognize that I'm not seeing all the colors I'm "supposed" to be able to, but viewing angle, contrast, etc. have all been fine. Only thing I've ever seen is the backlight in an older (3+ years of constants use) machine starting to go.
- jsz0 17y ago
  I think the display in the MBA at least is really good. As with any glossy display you have to move it a few CM now and again depending on ambient lighting conditions. Matte screens aren't really immune to that either though.
- gommm 17y ago
  Apart from the 6-bit color gamut problem, the viewing angle and contrast on my macbook pro is really good... I wish it weren't this glossy though...
branden 17y ago
This is really disappointing. I was about to buy a T400 after my way-too-expensive and way-too-flimsy HP Pavillion's screen finally died. It was the rock-solid construction and nonshit keyboard that drew me to it. Is there anything like that with a screen that doesn't suck?
- lamnk 17y ago
  I suggest you buy or take a look at HP business line. I have a HP Compaq 6910p and an IBM (not Lenovo, mind you) T60 and actually prefer HP's keyboard over Thinkpad's. Oh well, but its screen sucks too :-(
iigs 17y ago
I'm a screen junkie. The 14" diagonal widescreen perplexes me. They have terrible color and resolution and are just generally miserable. IPS panels ("FlexView" in IBM/Lenovo-speak) make a tremendous difference. Compare these two pictures: http://ii.gs/gamma/t60p-t61p-onaxis.jpg http://ii.gs/gamma/t60p-t61p-onaxis.jpg http://ii.gs/gamma/t60p-t61p-up.jpg http://ii.gs/gamma/t60p-t61p-up.jpg I set up a site for quickly ironing out calibration issues with monitors that people may be interested in: http://ii.gs/gamma/ http://ii.gs/gamma/
- Zak 17y ago
  This makes me really glad I got a T60p when I had the chance. Somebody sold off a bunch of them on ebay for $350 each a few months ago. Is there a truly high-end laptop left? Apple's current offerings are a bit disappointing and it doesn't sound like new Thinkpads are any better.
  - mhb 17y ago
    I'm happy with my X200s. I got it with the big battery, but that lasted so long, I changed to the smallest battery. Now it's incredibly light and has a quite reasonable battery life. The keyboard is great. The screen is fine - much better than my previous X40. It seems like an over-generalization to say that the new Thinkpads are worse than the old ones,
    - technomancy 17y ago
      Agreed. I've had two lenovo X-series models (X61s and X200s); they've both been fantastic.
- rbanffy 17y ago
  Nice pics, nice site, but, as an old computer collector, I must say: excellent domain.
eli 17y ago
I just set up half a dozen new T400s and they looked fine to me. shrug
- pmjordan 17y ago
  T400s != T400. The T400s is a premium-range model as far as I can tell, the T400 is about 700 grams heavier and has a worse screen. How is the T400s by the way? I was thinking of getting one of those, though I'm slightly put off by the 1.8" HDD/SSD bay.
  - mapleoin 17y ago
    I read T400s as the plural of T400.
  - eli 17y ago
    Sorry, several new T400 laptops (plural). I believe they were the 14.1" WSXGA+ models. You can buy 'em pretty cheap direct from Lenovo, especially if you wait for a sale code (which seems like every other month) I didn't realize they still had the -s line, actually.
    - pmjordan 17y ago
      I should have realised that, sorry. The -s suffix exists for a handful of models (e.g. X200s) and seems to mean "slim" or so. Unfortunately, it seems you can't order from Lenovo directly in Europe, so no sale prices for me.
plinkplonk 17y ago
OK, as someone who knows nothing about how to evaluate displays, what kind of laptop monitor should I be looking for? Where do I find information on which laptop has the best monitors? Thanks in advance.
- old-gregg 17y ago
  Simple: there are 3 basic technologies involved and each has a good and cheap flavors. 1. Color resolution. Pick 8bits instead of 6. This is the most important spec. Oftentimes it is not published precisely because it's important, but 8-bit displays are always marked as having 16.7 millions of colors, whereas 6-bit panels are often marked as simply "millions" (in reality they can display only 262K colors) 2. LCD pixel tech: pick IPS or PVA instead of cheaper TN. This very important spec is also intentionally left out of the official specsheet, but good IPS panels have 178/178 viewing angle, i.e. the same number vertically/horizontally. TN-based junk does not - you can tell even visually by tilting it left/right and up/down. 3. Backlight tech. Pick LED instead of CCFL. LEDs are brighter, they don't add yellowish cast and consume far less energy. Bottom line, look for a panel which is advertised as 16.7 million colors LED LCD with 178/178 viewing angle.
  - plinkplonk 17y ago
    @old-gregg Awesome reply! Thank You! This helped me narrow down some candidates. I am in your debt! Edit: clarification: I didn't find a laptop with a screen that met these specs but it help me choose a desktop monitor.
- aurora72 17y ago
  I'm surprised that no one in this thread has mentioned the OLED technology. just take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OLED http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OLED and you'll understand why it's the best: It just doesn't require any backlight, resulting in the most natural and eye-friendly viewing.
rsheridan6 17y ago
Actually, that sounds like an ideal machine to implement pg's idea of having a dedicated work machine where you don't screw around procrastinating. Your screen doesn't have to look good to use Emacs.
- graywh 17y ago
  pg suggests using Vim. :)
- jrockway 17y ago
  I have a thinkpad with a screen like the one in the review. There is no contrast between the black background and the white text (or vice-versa). It is very painful to use. Unless you are using emacsspeak, you do not want to edit text on this thing. (Actually, the speakers are crap too, so emacsspeak is probably painful as well. Good work, Lenovo.)
  - rsheridan6 17y ago
    Wow, that's really bad. Never mind.
DarkShikari 17y ago
In my experience (Thinkpads as employee laptops at Facebook) there seem to be two varieties of screens: one set is utterly unusably bad while the other set is perfectly normal. They appear randomly on the same model, and your chance of getting one or the other is about 50/50. Of course, I wouldn't want to leave it to chance. Don't buy one.
matth2 17y ago
I have a Lenovo Thinkpad T61P. It would be a good machine except (1) the screen quality is consistent with that described in this article. Furthermore, it's developed hundreds of dead pixels. (2) The shift keys need to be hit exactly in the right place for them to work - the keyboard is a bit dodgy. (3) I had to replace the battery twice (under warranty) in a period of 6 months after buying it. I paid for quality (and was happy to based on reputation), but did not get it. It's been a very frustrating. My day job laptop is a Dell D630. Very happy with this. My next laptop will be a Dell. The track ball on the Lenovos is much better.
- kevinpet 17y ago
  I also have a D630 for work. When I am working at home and open up the downstairs HP to refer to something on a separate screen, I'm always struck by the massive difference in build quality. The HP Pavillion dv6100 feels like it's going to droop like a taffy bar when I hold it with one hand. The Dell has a good keyboard, a pointing stick, a power plug that doesn't make me worry about breaking it, and a marginally usable screen.
- janm 17y ago
  I have a D630 and I agree; it is a laptop and does all the right laptop things. However: I got my wife a Dell E4300 and had many problems. Other colleagues have got other E series Dells have have had basic problems like not being able to suspend/resume under Windows and being forced to run a single core to get basic reliable operation. See, for example: http://en.community.dell.com/forums/t/19245498.aspx?PageIndex=1 http://en.community.dell.com/forums/t/19245498.aspx?PageInde... http://www.datapoohbah.com/tech/2008/12/16/dell-e4300-is-bittersweet/ http://www.datapoohbah.com/tech/2008/12/16/dell-e4300-is-bit... I don't know if things have improved, but based on my experience the D630 was the last good laptop from Dell.
oblommer 17y ago
The last Lenovo/IBM laptop with a good screen was the T60p. I believe they actually used IPS panels for that LCD screen. The only good screens on Lenovo laptops these days are in the tablets. I know for a fact that the X200 tablet uses a good panel with decent colors and viewing angles, although it is hampered somewhat by the digitizer. It is possible to replace the LCD panel in some Lenovo models with other panels of higher quality. Here is an example of one such modification: http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=366472 http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=366472
brown9-2 17y ago
So, as someone potentially in the market for a new laptop, which brand (if any) would you guys recommend?
- jrockway 17y ago
  They all suck. Get a desktop. (I used to love Thinkpads, but this guy is right -- Lenovo cannot find a good supplier of screens. I heard this is because they will only use Chinese parts where possible, instead of Taiwanese, Japanese, or Korean parts. Needless to say, the Chinese cannot make LCDs.) HP doesn't make good laptops, Dell doesn't make good laptops (they are good at making laptops whose batteries last for about 15 minutes after a few weeks or so), Apple is Apple (nice screens, same crap everywhere else), etc. I might consider Asus next -- the eeepc 901 is the nicest laptop I've had. Nice screen. Unfortunately, the wireless card is a piece of shit that sometimes takes several tries to associate to WPA2 networks. "Known firmware issue." Great. Basically, everyone wants cheap, cheap, cheap, and that's what they get. People that actually use computers are part of their profession and not just for watching porn are shit out of luck as a result. (I will edit to add -- pricing things out, the desktop is an amazingly better value. For $2000, you can get a high-end Thinkpad with 2G of RAM, 2 cores, and a 160G SSD, etc. Or you can get a desktop with 8 cores, 16G of RAM, a 24" monitor, 4T of disk space, etc. Laptops are nice if you absolutely can't work at a desk. But if you can, you can save yourself a ton of money, and just use a netbook when traveling. I do this, but with a Thinkpad as my "desktop". It has not been undocked in years.)
  - plinkplonk 17y ago
    "They all suck. Get a desktop." I am coming to this conclusion too. How should I select a desktop monitor? Are there specific features to look for? Help a clueless-about-hardware fellow HN er!
    - jrockway 17y ago
      Go to the store and look at them? I have had good luck with Dell; a 24" LCD and a 37" TV. Both have beautiful color rendering, good contrast, great brightness. I have had the 24" LCD for probably 5 years, and it still looks as good as the day it arrived. I have not looked into LCDs for a while, so I don't know if Dell still makes good ones. The best guarantee of quality is probably to buy a high-end monitor from a company that also manufactures the actual panels.
mbrubeck 17y ago
I just got a T400 for Linux development last week, so I read this headline with not a small amount of trepidation. Fortunately I fall into the author's "Linux-powered typewriter" use case: I spend 80% of my time in fullscreen (using xmonad) bash or vim sessions, using white-on-black color schemes. For my development machine I don't really care about color fidelity or dynamic range. The reasons I like the T400 (and many of its Thinkpad siblings) are the trackpoint ("pencil eraser" mouse device), nice keyboard layout, and hardware that works out of the box with open-source drivers. I have had some intermittent freezes on suspend/resume, which I hope are fixed soon...
abalashov 17y ago
I really don't get the "calculator keyboard" thing on the newer MacBook Pros. That astounds me. I do not see how it is possible to type on that.
- tvon 17y ago
  Next to probably a ThinkPad keyboard (which I haven't used in about 4 years), the Apple external/thin keyboard is my favorite. I haven't tired it in a laptop though so I don't know if it's the same thing or not.
- agazso 17y ago
  Every new laptop keyboard needs time to get adjusted to. It took me about one day with the new Macbook/Pro keyboard, and since then I type quicker on it than any other keyboard. Maybe it's because the short pressing distance, or because the keys are really separated, I don't know.
  - cubicle67 17y ago
    same with my little MacBook; the screen's crap, but the 'calculator' keyboard is brilliant
- janm 17y ago
  I agree, and it's not just the MacBook Pros, it's also the keyboard that comes with the non-laptop Macs. My new Mac Pro came with a keyboard that was comparable with the keyboard on the Tandy Color Computer I had in the early 80s. On the Mac Pro it is easy to change the keyboard; I replaced it with a Unicomp keyboard. However, that's not so simple on a laptop, and the keyboard is a big thing stopping me from getting an Apple laptop.
mapleoin 17y ago
I have a T500 and don't really have any of the issues described. Viewing angle is perfect, colors are nice, contrast is nice etc. My screen is WSXGA+ though, so that might be non-standard.
ErrantX 17y ago
Review of a linux laptop As the issue is with the TFT screen I fail to see the relevance of including this in the title (especially as the post says it runs Linux reasonably well :))
- rbanffy 17y ago
  Actually, it says it runs Linux wonderfully.
scott_s 17y ago
I'm typing this on a T400 (not mine). Perhaps his screen is a dud? Either that, or my visual standards are lower than I thought.

46 points by old-gregg 17y ago

Google found this video of the t400 for those interested: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evk-Ln_TFLA http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evk-Ln_TFLA Apparently some people like the screen; some absolutely despise it. Here's a complete review - warning, bad music incoming: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKNxecHXUAU&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKNxecHXUAU&feature=relat...

dryicerx 17y ago

This is rather depressing. I've been a huge ThinkPad fan, on my 3rd T-series at the moment... a T61p that still wore a IBM sticker and can't praise more for the wonderful WUXGA screen... but guess Lenovo's corner cutting is finally catching up, hopefully this is just a isolated case. I'll always love and remember the thinkpads (at least IBM era) for their tank like qualities; being able to use the laptop as a blunt weapon in a fight and later using the same laptop to code and blog is a good feeling.

jonny_noog 17y ago
Agreed. I have an IBM/Lenovo T60 which I run Debian on and it has served me well, had it now for must be going on three years, never had an issue with it, the build quality is rock solid. But even when these ThinkPads were released, around about the time that they were making the brand transition from IBM to Lenovo, I had doubts about what this meant for the future of the ThinkPad. I have heard numerous horror stories about the quality of Lenovo gear since then. I am saddened to think that my T60 may be the last ThinkPad I will ever have considered buying. But then I am somewhat consoled when I remember that my next laptop will probably be a Mac to go with my recently acquired Mac desktop. Aside from not being able to so readily beat someone to death with a MacBook Pro, for me, Mac laptops are the new ThinkPads, mainly because I bought my ThinkPad primarily to run a Unix-like OS (Debian), and OS X fits that desire too. You also get to pay a premium for a Mac, just like a ThinkPad. :P
- mst 17y ago
  I keep vaguely hearing horror stories but all the people I can actually pin down as owning lenovo thinkpads are having a great time with them - me included. I suspect what we actually have here is a case of the usual random set of poor experiences with any given product being much more conversationally trafficked because people assume that "this is my first troublesome thinkpad" must be because of the Lenovo switch rather than just being an unfortunate coincidence.
  - jonny_noog 17y ago
    Yeah, just to be clear, when I said "I have heard numerous horror stories about the quality of Lenovo gear since then." I was actually referring mainly to anecdotes I had heard from people relating to non-ThinkPad Lenovo laptops. As I said, I've had no problem with my T60, it's a great laptop for my purposes and I have not purchased a ThinkPad newer than my T60. My only concern about the newer ThinkPads - based off these anecdotes - is that the quality of ThinkPads may be adversely affected as they ostensibly become more Lenovo and less IBM.
tomjen2 17y ago
Not just that, but they also had a decent keyboard. I took out my old one (pre Lenovo) and was just amazed by how good the keyboard was.
ErrantX 17y ago
Agreed. We have 5 old thinkpads from the IBM era (they are "R5" series I think off the top of my head) which run Backtrack or other flavours of Linux and work without fault even today. We bought some Lenovo Thinkpads the other week for new employee's to use remotely - what a load of awfulness they were! Already trying to find a decent replacement.

al3x 17y ago

I was researching various Thinkpad models for a friend (and out of idle curiosity at the non-Mac laptop market) the other week, and found that complaints about the display quality are true across the Thinkpad line, even including their pricey MacBook Air competitor, the X300. Pretty surprising, given the Thinkpad reputation for quality.

pyre 17y ago
> Pretty surprising, given the Thinkpad reputation for quality. Why is that? The reputation of ThinkPads was created while they were owned by IBM. It's just taken a while for Lenovo to start screwing with the brand that it bought.

earl 17y ago

I swore off Thinkpads when my $2K (at the time) T60 couldn't drive an external 24 inch monitor without horrid text flickering. Thinkpad's "solution" was to buy a $350 dock that had better external monitor electronics. Um, thanks, but no thanks.

tdavis 17y ago

I was wondering when somebody was going to put out a consumer-grade LCD so terrible that a consumer actually noticed. Even Macs use sub-par panels and nobody seems to notice. I await the day when I am not considered a "Professional" for requiring S-IPS or better panels -- I'm tired of paying a near-50% markup on my LCDs.

cubicle67 17y ago
I have an early 2006 20" iMac (one of the first Intel ones) and it has one of the best displays I've ever seen. I also have a 1st gen unibody Macbook, and the display on that is pretty crappy.
- chrisbolt 17y ago
  The 20" iMacs have far worse LCDs than the 24" ones though.
  - pmjordan 17y ago
    The 2006 (Core Duo as opposed to Core 2 Duo; white plastic case) iMacs still had Matte displays if I remember correctly, I don't think there were 24" versions of those. Today's 20" aluminium iMacs have awful displays.
    - cubicle67 17y ago
      yes, it was a matt display Core Duo, and also sure 20" was the largest (sizes were 17" and 20")
  - yardie 17y ago
    The first gen 20" iMacs were the midgrade model at the time. The 17" iMacs came with the crappy displays because they were the baseline. Not all 20" iMacs had worse LCDs than the 24" but all 24" iMacs have the best LCDs available. Within reason of course. Most people won't buy a $1200 calibrated NEC or Lacie. 2006 - 20" iMac IPS 24" iMac IPS 2009 - 20" iMac TN 24" iMac H-IPS

moe 17y ago

Did I miss the sarcasm or does he really suggest to buy apple instead? Last time I checked the Apple panels were horrible. Perhaps not as bad as this foul egg, but still with comparable viewing angle problems; the slightest head-movement would wash out the top or bottom part of the display. I also recall horrible contrast (white bloom)...

old-gregg 17y ago
Regular white Macbooks are pretty bad, sure but matte MBPs are OK: the color gamut is still limited by 6 bits but viewing angles aren't bad IMO. According to my extensive googling only HP's "DreamColor" line of laptops gives you a true 8-bit non-TN panel. http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-10041-10146 http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-10041-...
ubernostrum 17y ago
I can't say I've ever had quality problems with the screens on any of the Mac laptops I've used. Admittedly I'm not a graphic designer (and I'm mildly colorblind) so I may not be able to recognize that I'm not seeing all the colors I'm "supposed" to be able to, but viewing angle, contrast, etc. have all been fine. Only thing I've ever seen is the backlight in an older (3+ years of constants use) machine starting to go.
jsz0 17y ago
I think the display in the MBA at least is really good. As with any glossy display you have to move it a few CM now and again depending on ambient lighting conditions. Matte screens aren't really immune to that either though.
gommm 17y ago
Apart from the 6-bit color gamut problem, the viewing angle and contrast on my macbook pro is really good... I wish it weren't this glossy though...

branden 17y ago

This is really disappointing. I was about to buy a T400 after my way-too-expensive and way-too-flimsy HP Pavillion's screen finally died. It was the rock-solid construction and nonshit keyboard that drew me to it. Is there anything like that with a screen that doesn't suck?

lamnk 17y ago
I suggest you buy or take a look at HP business line. I have a HP Compaq 6910p and an IBM (not Lenovo, mind you) T60 and actually prefer HP's keyboard over Thinkpad's. Oh well, but its screen sucks too :-(

iigs 17y ago

I'm a screen junkie. The 14" diagonal widescreen perplexes me. They have terrible color and resolution and are just generally miserable. IPS panels ("FlexView" in IBM/Lenovo-speak) make a tremendous difference. Compare these two pictures: http://ii.gs/gamma/t60p-t61p-onaxis.jpg http://ii.gs/gamma/t60p-t61p-onaxis.jpg http://ii.gs/gamma/t60p-t61p-up.jpg http://ii.gs/gamma/t60p-t61p-up.jpg I set up a site for quickly ironing out calibration issues with monitors that people may be interested in: http://ii.gs/gamma/ http://ii.gs/gamma/

Zak 17y ago
This makes me really glad I got a T60p when I had the chance. Somebody sold off a bunch of them on ebay for $350 each a few months ago. Is there a truly high-end laptop left? Apple's current offerings are a bit disappointing and it doesn't sound like new Thinkpads are any better.
- mhb 17y ago
  I'm happy with my X200s. I got it with the big battery, but that lasted so long, I changed to the smallest battery. Now it's incredibly light and has a quite reasonable battery life. The keyboard is great. The screen is fine - much better than my previous X40. It seems like an over-generalization to say that the new Thinkpads are worse than the old ones,
  - technomancy 17y ago
    Agreed. I've had two lenovo X-series models (X61s and X200s); they've both been fantastic.
rbanffy 17y ago
Nice pics, nice site, but, as an old computer collector, I must say: excellent domain.

eli 17y ago

I just set up half a dozen new T400s and they looked fine to me. shrug

pmjordan 17y ago
T400s != T400. The T400s is a premium-range model as far as I can tell, the T400 is about 700 grams heavier and has a worse screen. How is the T400s by the way? I was thinking of getting one of those, though I'm slightly put off by the 1.8" HDD/SSD bay.
- mapleoin 17y ago
  I read T400s as the plural of T400.
- eli 17y ago
  Sorry, several new T400 laptops (plural). I believe they were the 14.1" WSXGA+ models. You can buy 'em pretty cheap direct from Lenovo, especially if you wait for a sale code (which seems like every other month) I didn't realize they still had the -s line, actually.
  - pmjordan 17y ago
    I should have realised that, sorry. The -s suffix exists for a handful of models (e.g. X200s) and seems to mean "slim" or so. Unfortunately, it seems you can't order from Lenovo directly in Europe, so no sale prices for me.

plinkplonk 17y ago

OK, as someone who knows nothing about how to evaluate displays, what kind of laptop monitor should I be looking for? Where do I find information on which laptop has the best monitors? Thanks in advance.

old-gregg 17y ago
Simple: there are 3 basic technologies involved and each has a good and cheap flavors. 1. Color resolution. Pick 8bits instead of 6. This is the most important spec. Oftentimes it is not published precisely because it's important, but 8-bit displays are always marked as having 16.7 millions of colors, whereas 6-bit panels are often marked as simply "millions" (in reality they can display only 262K colors) 2. LCD pixel tech: pick IPS or PVA instead of cheaper TN. This very important spec is also intentionally left out of the official specsheet, but good IPS panels have 178/178 viewing angle, i.e. the same number vertically/horizontally. TN-based junk does not - you can tell even visually by tilting it left/right and up/down. 3. Backlight tech. Pick LED instead of CCFL. LEDs are brighter, they don't add yellowish cast and consume far less energy. Bottom line, look for a panel which is advertised as 16.7 million colors LED LCD with 178/178 viewing angle.
- plinkplonk 17y ago
  @old-gregg Awesome reply! Thank You! This helped me narrow down some candidates. I am in your debt! Edit: clarification: I didn't find a laptop with a screen that met these specs but it help me choose a desktop monitor.
aurora72 17y ago
I'm surprised that no one in this thread has mentioned the OLED technology. just take a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OLED http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OLED and you'll understand why it's the best: It just doesn't require any backlight, resulting in the most natural and eye-friendly viewing.

rsheridan6 17y ago

Actually, that sounds like an ideal machine to implement pg's idea of having a dedicated work machine where you don't screw around procrastinating. Your screen doesn't have to look good to use Emacs.

graywh 17y ago
pg suggests using Vim. :)
jrockway 17y ago
I have a thinkpad with a screen like the one in the review. There is no contrast between the black background and the white text (or vice-versa). It is very painful to use. Unless you are using emacsspeak, you do not want to edit text on this thing. (Actually, the speakers are crap too, so emacsspeak is probably painful as well. Good work, Lenovo.)
- rsheridan6 17y ago
  Wow, that's really bad. Never mind.

DarkShikari 17y ago

In my experience (Thinkpads as employee laptops at Facebook) there seem to be two varieties of screens: one set is utterly unusably bad while the other set is perfectly normal. They appear randomly on the same model, and your chance of getting one or the other is about 50/50. Of course, I wouldn't want to leave it to chance. Don't buy one.

matth2 17y ago

I have a Lenovo Thinkpad T61P. It would be a good machine except (1) the screen quality is consistent with that described in this article. Furthermore, it's developed hundreds of dead pixels. (2) The shift keys need to be hit exactly in the right place for them to work - the keyboard is a bit dodgy. (3) I had to replace the battery twice (under warranty) in a period of 6 months after buying it. I paid for quality (and was happy to based on reputation), but did not get it. It's been a very frustrating. My day job laptop is a Dell D630. Very happy with this. My next laptop will be a Dell. The track ball on the Lenovos is much better.

kevinpet 17y ago
I also have a D630 for work. When I am working at home and open up the downstairs HP to refer to something on a separate screen, I'm always struck by the massive difference in build quality. The HP Pavillion dv6100 feels like it's going to droop like a taffy bar when I hold it with one hand. The Dell has a good keyboard, a pointing stick, a power plug that doesn't make me worry about breaking it, and a marginally usable screen.
janm 17y ago
I have a D630 and I agree; it is a laptop and does all the right laptop things. However: I got my wife a Dell E4300 and had many problems. Other colleagues have got other E series Dells have have had basic problems like not being able to suspend/resume under Windows and being forced to run a single core to get basic reliable operation. See, for example: http://en.community.dell.com/forums/t/19245498.aspx?PageIndex=1 http://en.community.dell.com/forums/t/19245498.aspx?PageInde... http://www.datapoohbah.com/tech/2008/12/16/dell-e4300-is-bittersweet/ http://www.datapoohbah.com/tech/2008/12/16/dell-e4300-is-bit... I don't know if things have improved, but based on my experience the D630 was the last good laptop from Dell.

oblommer 17y ago

The last Lenovo/IBM laptop with a good screen was the T60p. I believe they actually used IPS panels for that LCD screen. The only good screens on Lenovo laptops these days are in the tablets. I know for a fact that the X200 tablet uses a good panel with decent colors and viewing angles, although it is hampered somewhat by the digitizer. It is possible to replace the LCD panel in some Lenovo models with other panels of higher quality. Here is an example of one such modification: http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=366472 http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=366472

brown9-2 17y ago

So, as someone potentially in the market for a new laptop, which brand (if any) would you guys recommend?

jrockway 17y ago
They all suck. Get a desktop. (I used to love Thinkpads, but this guy is right -- Lenovo cannot find a good supplier of screens. I heard this is because they will only use Chinese parts where possible, instead of Taiwanese, Japanese, or Korean parts. Needless to say, the Chinese cannot make LCDs.) HP doesn't make good laptops, Dell doesn't make good laptops (they are good at making laptops whose batteries last for about 15 minutes after a few weeks or so), Apple is Apple (nice screens, same crap everywhere else), etc. I might consider Asus next -- the eeepc 901 is the nicest laptop I've had. Nice screen. Unfortunately, the wireless card is a piece of shit that sometimes takes several tries to associate to WPA2 networks. "Known firmware issue." Great. Basically, everyone wants cheap, cheap, cheap, and that's what they get. People that actually use computers are part of their profession and not just for watching porn are shit out of luck as a result. (I will edit to add -- pricing things out, the desktop is an amazingly better value. For $2000, you can get a high-end Thinkpad with 2G of RAM, 2 cores, and a 160G SSD, etc. Or you can get a desktop with 8 cores, 16G of RAM, a 24" monitor, 4T of disk space, etc. Laptops are nice if you absolutely can't work at a desk. But if you can, you can save yourself a ton of money, and just use a netbook when traveling. I do this, but with a Thinkpad as my "desktop". It has not been undocked in years.)
- plinkplonk 17y ago
  "They all suck. Get a desktop." I am coming to this conclusion too. How should I select a desktop monitor? Are there specific features to look for? Help a clueless-about-hardware fellow HN er!
  - jrockway 17y ago
    Go to the store and look at them? I have had good luck with Dell; a 24" LCD and a 37" TV. Both have beautiful color rendering, good contrast, great brightness. I have had the 24" LCD for probably 5 years, and it still looks as good as the day it arrived. I have not looked into LCDs for a while, so I don't know if Dell still makes good ones. The best guarantee of quality is probably to buy a high-end monitor from a company that also manufactures the actual panels.

mbrubeck 17y ago

I just got a T400 for Linux development last week, so I read this headline with not a small amount of trepidation. Fortunately I fall into the author's "Linux-powered typewriter" use case: I spend 80% of my time in fullscreen (using xmonad) bash or vim sessions, using white-on-black color schemes. For my development machine I don't really care about color fidelity or dynamic range. The reasons I like the T400 (and many of its Thinkpad siblings) are the trackpoint ("pencil eraser" mouse device), nice keyboard layout, and hardware that works out of the box with open-source drivers. I have had some intermittent freezes on suspend/resume, which I hope are fixed soon...

abalashov 17y ago

I really don't get the "calculator keyboard" thing on the newer MacBook Pros. That astounds me. I do not see how it is possible to type on that.

tvon 17y ago
Next to probably a ThinkPad keyboard (which I haven't used in about 4 years), the Apple external/thin keyboard is my favorite. I haven't tired it in a laptop though so I don't know if it's the same thing or not.
agazso 17y ago
Every new laptop keyboard needs time to get adjusted to. It took me about one day with the new Macbook/Pro keyboard, and since then I type quicker on it than any other keyboard. Maybe it's because the short pressing distance, or because the keys are really separated, I don't know.
- cubicle67 17y ago
  same with my little MacBook; the screen's crap, but the 'calculator' keyboard is brilliant
janm 17y ago
I agree, and it's not just the MacBook Pros, it's also the keyboard that comes with the non-laptop Macs. My new Mac Pro came with a keyboard that was comparable with the keyboard on the Tandy Color Computer I had in the early 80s. On the Mac Pro it is easy to change the keyboard; I replaced it with a Unicomp keyboard. However, that's not so simple on a laptop, and the keyboard is a big thing stopping me from getting an Apple laptop.

mapleoin 17y ago

I have a T500 and don't really have any of the issues described. Viewing angle is perfect, colors are nice, contrast is nice etc. My screen is WSXGA+ though, so that might be non-standard.

ErrantX 17y ago

Review of a linux laptop As the issue is with the TFT screen I fail to see the relevance of including this in the title (especially as the post says it runs Linux reasonably well :))

rbanffy 17y ago
Actually, it says it runs Linux wonderfully.

scott_s 17y ago

I'm typing this on a T400 (not mine). Perhaps his screen is a dud? Either that, or my visual standards are lower than I thought.