3 ms·
[stateless] is actually, pretty hard to actually implement and systemd is trying really hard to do this. Support for stateless has existed in RedHat based dist
by thwarted 12y ago
[stateless] is actually, pretty hard to actually implement and systemd is trying really hard to do this.
Support for stateless has existed in RedHat based distributions since at least 2003-2004. I, in fact, used it to run a ~50 seat callcenter using read-only NFS root systems, with a dynamically populated /etc, a decade ago.
- sandGorgon 12y agoAnd that pretty much encapsulates, what systemd is attempting vs what people think it is attempting. Systemd is not innovating on ideas, but on implementation. How do you make things like service dependencies, stateless systems, etc consistently possible. It is bringing something which was possible only for a person of your skill level, down to mine. I would say it is the same difference between Ubuntu and Arch - idiotproofing the Linux ecosystem.