> Frankly, it seems to me that this is your inability to accept change. I'm more than willing to accept change if that change is at all beneficial. Systemd sim

> Frankly, it seems to me that this is your inability to accept change. I'm more than willing to accept change if that change is at all beneficial. Systemd simply fails to offer any beneficial changes to me and several harmful ones. You're right, they're not so much technical issues or bugs as usability and system philosophy issues. But issues which should not be simply dismissed nonetheless. So, please, tell me, why should I accept change just for the sake of change? Especially when those changes seem to be against the philosophy of a simple, easy to understand system. EDIT: thought I should note this too > And sorry, but i don't see how 99,9999% of Debian users should stay on sysv init I'm not suggesting that they do. By all means, change the default if most users desire it. This post is simply about allowing for flexibility of init system. I don't see why you have such a problem with that.