4 ms·
It's discussed below[1]. AFAIK people of the same sex cannot have a biological descendant of both so it's inconsequential here. A more pertinent complaint is th
by spindritf 12y ago
It's discussed below[1]. AFAIK people of the same sex cannot have a biological descendant of both so it's inconsequential here. A more pertinent complaint is the one you cut out: incest.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8469570 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8469570
- rmc 12y ago(a) Lots of family tree software supports non-biological/genetic decendents, like adoption. Why allow recording of adoption for different sex couples but not same-sex couples? (b) In places with gender recognition law, someone can legally have their new gender recognised, and hence be legally female or male, and be capable of genetically producing children with someone of the same gender.
- spindritf 12y agoI'm guessing they're not big on sex change either.