It's more conventional here to leave the title unchanged, just to avoid sensationalism and misdirection. I am sure you meant well, but what's stopping a pro-im

It's more conventional here to leave the title unchanged, just to avoid sensationalism and misdirection. I am sure you meant well, but what's stopping a pro-immigration submitter from underplaying the effect of migrants on the British labor market by quoting any of the company statements including this :"They are not filling roles that require a permanent UK presence.", etc. Changing the subjective unnecessarily reframes the debate, and what could have been an objective piece becomes a subject propaganda pamphlet (not to mention the cred-hijacking associated with putting the publication's name beside an inflammatory/unsubstantiated claim) Of course, there is also the risk of excessive meta-debate from pedantic jerkwads like myself. Regards.