He did say "no known" detriments and from all I've read and heard, that remains true. There's correlations and linkage suggestions flung all around in the medic

He did say "no known" detriments and from all I've read and heard, that remains true. There's correlations and linkage suggestions flung all around in the medical industry, but until proven, I think it's perfectly alright to say "no known" whatever. Besides the patronizing of the parent post, I do think your argument is valid. Mostly since you use the phrases "stronger possibility." But again, without clinical proof, your argument is only as good as parent's.