3 ms·

White men do not understand, any more than I understand what it feels like to be a rabbit. Your comment is a clear example of that failure -- actually, it's wor

White men do not understand, any more than I understand what it feels like to be a rabbit. Your comment is a clear example of that failure -- actually, it's worse, because you don't even understand the problem intellectually. Some white men do acknowledge their privilege, but even for them, it will never be possible to experience true systemic hostility based on their gender or race. "Occasionally my gender-race is criticized for the oppression it, as a whole, has and continues to heap on other groups" cries the white man. "Hostility! I understand it!" he says. Meanwhile, all the other groups deal with actual adversity. I mean things worse than newspaper articles pointing out how you start with advantage. Things like disproportionate violence at the hands of the police and the state, disproportionate victimization with sexual violence, inability to move forward in the corporate world, imbalanced expectations regarding family life, dress, body shape, etc. Even things like being less likely to be called back for a job interview because of your name. Yeah, white men, including you, really do not get it.

boombip 12y ago
I like how you assume that he/she is white, or even a man at all.
- jamesaguilar 12y ago
  It's possible that someone from another race or gender feels that white men have it tough. I've never met such a person.
verroq 12y ago
How is it his fault and why should he care? He didn't choose to be born as a white man. He has no more responsibility for his race than any national for their country.
- jamesaguilar 12y ago
  Where did I say it was his fault? If I said that, it was an error. It's not relevant whose fault it is. (Except if you're referring to the fault of not knowing that he's privileged. That is his fault.) Why should he care? That's a question about his particular ethical priorities that I could only guess at. Why should any advantaged person care about the disadvantaged?
  - verroq 12y ago
    Suppose I belong to an advantaged group, what good does it do to me if I admit the advantage exists? Why would I ever want to give up this advantage? Income inequality didn't prevent a rising standard of living for everyone, what makes social inequality inherently bad?
    - jamesaguilar 12y ago
      Again, these are questions about your ethical framework that are not answerable by me. Personally I find it detestable and anti-social to try to hoard unearned advantages based on race and gender. If you were my friend and admitted this to me face to face, I would have to seriously consider our relationship. But you aren't my friend, and if you're OK with it there's little I could possibly say to convince you otherwise, especially on the internet.
      - verroq 12y ago
        Hoarding these advantages may make life better for everyone.
        jamesaguilar 12y ago
        > Hoarding these advantages may make life better for everyone. Ew. What a gross thought. I guess it's convenient to believe for a privileged person, but, ew.
        verroq 12y ago
        Rich privilege should also really be a thing, people like Bill Gates never used his privilege to make the world a better place.
mynameishere 12y ago
You don't really need to keep repeating the propaganda from those diversity seminars. We've heard it. And most of us who pay attention know it's all bull. As an example: disproportionate victimization with sexual violence Well, look at who is committing all that sexual violence and then talk about how white people are at fault: http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus/current/cv0842.pdf http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus/current/cv0842.pdf Most of your other comments are similarly flawed. However, the shortest retort to every bitch and moan that comes from the grievance industry is the simple fact that black people in the US have a higher per capita income than any country in Africa [1]. Most other relevant metrics like education, lifespan, and even crime stats paint a pretty good picture for blacks living under the merciless jackboot of evil whites, when compared to living without all that racism. [2] [1] Actually, except one. That exception has a pretty straightforward explanation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equatorial_Guinea#mediaviewer/File:Tree_map_exports_2009_Equatorial_Guinea.jpeg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equatorial_Guinea#mediaviewer/F... [2] Example. Note that most exceptions are Arabic. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentiona...
- jamesaguilar 12y ago
  > Sexual violence ... white people ????? Obviously, I was referring to men as the oppressing group on this point. Re. the rest, let me make sure I understand your position. "As long as there is someplace black people are worse off than they are in the US, they have nothing to complain about and white privilege doesn't exist." Am I reading you right?
- vacri 12y ago
  Black people in America are Americans, not Africans. They're not 'Africans who came to America'. They're Americans. Their parents were Americans, as were their parents' parents, for a few generations back. At this point, they're no more African than the white people of America are. It's a pointless comparison.
lexcorvus 12y ago
Yeah, white men, including you, really do not get it. Dude, you're white—or, at least, you look white [1], which is all the ammunition a Social Justice Warrior needs to accuse you of White Privilege, no matter what your surname is. Realize that, if they ever come after you, it will be people like me who'll defend you. [1]: From jamesaguilar's HN profile (no cyberstalking required): http://fb.me/james.aguilar http://fb.me/james.aguilar
- jamesaguilar 12y ago
  I am white. I do have white privilege. I do not need anyone to defend me from activists seeking equality.
  - lexcorvus 12y ago
    I do not need anyone to defend me from activists seeking equality. You really need to study the French Revolution. You think that because you're part of the current revolution that it won't eventually consume you as well? Consider Danton and Robespierre, a couple of the original "activists seeking equality" (or, rather, égalité). Danton once thought as you do; on his way to the guillotine he shouted at his former ally, "Robespierre, you will follow me! Your house will be razed! Salt will be sown there!" [1] Robespierre once thought as you do; he met the same fate as Danton less than four months later. [1]: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Jacques_Danton http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Jacques_Danton, « Robespierre, tu me suis ! Ta maison sera rasée ! On y sèmera du sel ! », my translation
    - jamesaguilar 12y ago
      Far more worried about an asteroid wiping out life on the planet than I am worried about women and minorities guillotining me.
      - lexcorvus 12y ago
        Don't be so literal. Social Justice Warriors won't guillotine you, but give them half a chance and they will destroy your job and ruin your reputation.

boombip 12y ago

I like how you assume that he/she is white, or even a man at all.

jamesaguilar 12y ago
It's possible that someone from another race or gender feels that white men have it tough. I've never met such a person.

verroq 12y ago

How is it his fault and why should he care? He didn't choose to be born as a white man. He has no more responsibility for his race than any national for their country.

jamesaguilar 12y ago
Where did I say it was his fault? If I said that, it was an error. It's not relevant whose fault it is. (Except if you're referring to the fault of not knowing that he's privileged. That is his fault.) Why should he care? That's a question about his particular ethical priorities that I could only guess at. Why should any advantaged person care about the disadvantaged?
- verroq 12y ago
  Suppose I belong to an advantaged group, what good does it do to me if I admit the advantage exists? Why would I ever want to give up this advantage? Income inequality didn't prevent a rising standard of living for everyone, what makes social inequality inherently bad?
  - jamesaguilar 12y ago
    Again, these are questions about your ethical framework that are not answerable by me. Personally I find it detestable and anti-social to try to hoard unearned advantages based on race and gender. If you were my friend and admitted this to me face to face, I would have to seriously consider our relationship. But you aren't my friend, and if you're OK with it there's little I could possibly say to convince you otherwise, especially on the internet.
    - verroq 12y ago
      Hoarding these advantages may make life better for everyone.
      - jamesaguilar 12y ago
        > Hoarding these advantages may make life better for everyone. Ew. What a gross thought. I guess it's convenient to believe for a privileged person, but, ew.
        verroq 12y ago
        Rich privilege should also really be a thing, people like Bill Gates never used his privilege to make the world a better place.

mynameishere 12y ago

You don't really need to keep repeating the propaganda from those diversity seminars. We've heard it. And most of us who pay attention know it's all bull. As an example: disproportionate victimization with sexual violence Well, look at who is committing all that sexual violence and then talk about how white people are at fault: http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus/current/cv0842.pdf http://bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/cvus/current/cv0842.pdf Most of your other comments are similarly flawed. However, the shortest retort to every bitch and moan that comes from the grievance industry is the simple fact that black people in the US have a higher per capita income than any country in Africa [1]. Most other relevant metrics like education, lifespan, and even crime stats paint a pretty good picture for blacks living under the merciless jackboot of evil whites, when compared to living without all that racism. [2] [1] Actually, except one. That exception has a pretty straightforward explanation: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equatorial_Guinea#mediaviewer/File:Tree_map_exports_2009_Equatorial_Guinea.jpeg http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equatorial_Guinea#mediaviewer/F... [2] Example. Note that most exceptions are Arabic. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentional_homicide_rate http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_intentiona...

jamesaguilar 12y ago
> Sexual violence ... white people ????? Obviously, I was referring to men as the oppressing group on this point. Re. the rest, let me make sure I understand your position. "As long as there is someplace black people are worse off than they are in the US, they have nothing to complain about and white privilege doesn't exist." Am I reading you right?
vacri 12y ago
Black people in America are Americans, not Africans. They're not 'Africans who came to America'. They're Americans. Their parents were Americans, as were their parents' parents, for a few generations back. At this point, they're no more African than the white people of America are. It's a pointless comparison.

lexcorvus 12y ago

Yeah, white men, including you, really do not get it. Dude, you're white—or, at least, you look white [1], which is all the ammunition a Social Justice Warrior needs to accuse you of White Privilege, no matter what your surname is. Realize that, if they ever come after you, it will be people like me who'll defend you. [1]: From jamesaguilar's HN profile (no cyberstalking required): http://fb.me/james.aguilar http://fb.me/james.aguilar

jamesaguilar 12y ago
I am white. I do have white privilege. I do not need anyone to defend me from activists seeking equality.
- lexcorvus 12y ago
  I do not need anyone to defend me from activists seeking equality. You really need to study the French Revolution. You think that because you're part of the current revolution that it won't eventually consume you as well? Consider Danton and Robespierre, a couple of the original "activists seeking equality" (or, rather, égalité). Danton once thought as you do; on his way to the guillotine he shouted at his former ally, "Robespierre, you will follow me! Your house will be razed! Salt will be sown there!" [1] Robespierre once thought as you do; he met the same fate as Danton less than four months later. [1]: http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Jacques_Danton http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Jacques_Danton, « Robespierre, tu me suis ! Ta maison sera rasée ! On y sèmera du sel ! », my translation
  - jamesaguilar 12y ago
    Far more worried about an asteroid wiping out life on the planet than I am worried about women and minorities guillotining me.
    - lexcorvus 12y ago
      Don't be so literal. Social Justice Warriors won't guillotine you, but give them half a chance and they will destroy your job and ruin your reputation.