You and the parent are both absolutely correct, in real life. It's just that iiuc, Wellesley doesn't sell "diversity," but "women." Wellesley's failure to tak

You and the parent are both absolutely correct, in real life. It's just that iiuc, Wellesley doesn't sell "diversity," but "women." Wellesley's failure to take a stance on having transmen around indicates hesitation and fear on their part (understandably so, imho) b/c who really knows - at this time - what is fair and just for their product case. Do they count women who became men as women, b/c that's part of the female experience? Or do they count them as men, b/c they're not women? Who knows.