3 ms·

The best comparison for IFrames would be that they cut the article out of a new yorker and glued it into the book

• galaxyLogic 12y ago
  That I think would be fraudulent misrepresentation of who owns the content in question. In practice nobody would do that a thousand times and if they did it would still not be "copying". They would have had to pay for all the "copies" of the paper from which they cut off the article. They would have paid for all those "copies" and thus they would have the right to distribute them (unless a private contract prohibited that). Misrepresenting the origin of the content could be considered fraud. But if you never implied that you created that content then maybe not.
• TheLoneWolfling 12y ago
  No. More like they provided instructions for you to cut the article out of a new yorker and glue it into the book. Important difference.