3 ms·
You might be right but it reminds me of the red bus case which may indicate the changing scope of copyright in the future: http://azrights.com/media/uncategori
by duncanawoods 12y ago
You might be right but it reminds me of the red bus case which may indicate the changing scope of copyright in the future:
http://azrights.com/media/uncategorized/2013/11/photographers-photography-copyright-and-the-red-bus-case/ http://azrights.com/media/uncategorized/2013/11/photographer...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_Island_v_New_English_Teas http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_Island_v_New_English_Tea...
- mamurphy 12y agoAs detailed in this blog post (http://permissionmachine.com/blog/rod-stewart-sued-for-recreating-a-photo-of-the-back-of-his-head/ http://permissionmachine.com/blog/rod-stewart-sued-for-recre...), the Rod Stewart photos look much more similar to the disputed photos in Temple Island v. New English Teas (the claimant won in that suit). When I viewed the side-by-side comparison, my reaction was "wow, she actually has a point!" not "this is a frivolous suit." Both photos show Rod with a black, long sleeve garment, show only his head, neck, and left shoulder, and have not dissimilar lighting and hair styling.