3 ms·

Album http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/c5/Storyteller-_The_Complete_Anthology_(Cover).jpg http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/c5/Storyteller-_T

• blt 12y ago
  Heh. Without knowing the images, I guessed that the old version was a blurry old 35mm photo and they wanted something higher resolution. That would be an interesting question - is a technically superior, but similar looking, image still a copy? But that is not the case here.
  • spellboots 12y ago
    35mm photos are very high resolution - between 87 and 175 megapixels according to http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/film-resolution.htm http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/film-resolution.htm
• danielweber 12y ago
  If the former were a trade mark, I think the original photographer would win easily (although perhaps not for $2.5 million). The new picture is obviously done to replicate and look like the old one. But copyright? I dunno. Seems like a derivative work, though.