4 ms·
Intriguing. I will add this to my daily news review (as first item), and see what is left when I get to the others. Thanks for doing this!
by PeterWhittaker 12y ago
Intriguing. I will add this to my daily news review (as first item), and see what is left when I get to the others. Thanks for doing this!
- brador 12y agoLeave feedback in the box on the site once you feel it out, many of the features you see have been at user request and anything goes!
- PeterWhittaker 12y agoLeft a couple already, thanks! (Mark unread; show more. Feel free to ask me about them if my one-liner was unclear!)
- brador 12y agoYep, I see them. Bad news! Mark as unread wouldn't work because during busy times there's a flood of fresh links, making marking anything not useful. Show more is interesting. Hard work to implement, but i've logged it to investigate. Thanks for dropping by!
- PeterWhittaker 12y agoDid I write "mark unread"? Well, that was nutty. I meant "mark as read". I have a browser plugin that does this (LinkVisitor), but it does it either for all links on a page or individually selected links. It would be handy if skimfeed could mark a section as read (visited) in my browser history; then the link would grey out in other sections as well, making my skimming more efficient.
- PeterWhittaker 12y agoAh, upon further review, I understand: All of the links on skimfeed are links to skimfeed, containing the original URL. That's why things are showing up as read (visited) if I've already read them elsewhere. Hmm, can you make the links real links (so they will be visited if I've been elsewhere) but use some JS magic to manage whatever magic you are accomplishing with the skimfeed-based links?